Megavolt bremsstrahlung measurements from linear induction accelerators demonstrate possible use as a FLASH radiotherapy source to reduce acute toxicity.

Recent studies indicate better efficacy and healthy tissue sparing with high dose-rate FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) cancer treatment. This technique delivers a prompt high radiation dose rather than fractional doses over time. While some suggest thresholds of > 40 Gy s-1 with a maximal effect at > 100 Gy s-1, accumulated evidence shows that instantaneous dose-rate and irradiation time are critical. Mechanisms are still debated, but toxicity is minimized while inducing apoptosis in malignant tissue. Delivery technologies to date show that a capability gap exists with clinic scale, broad area, deep penetrating, high dose rate systems. Based on these trends, if FLASH-RT is adopted, it may become a dominant approach except in the least technologically advanced countries. The linear induction accelerator (LIA) developed for high instantaneous and high average dose-rate, species independent charged particle acceleration, has yet to be considered for this application. We review the status of LIA technology, explore the physics of bremsstrahlung-converter-target interactions and our work on stabilizing the electron beam. While the gradient of the LIA is low, we present our preliminary work to improve the gradient by an order of magnitude, presenting a point design for a multibeam FLASH-RT system using a single accelerator for application to conformal FLASH-RT.

ROAD: ROtational direct Aperture optimization with a Decoupled ring-collimator for FLASH radiotherapy.

Ultra-high dose rate in radiotherapy (FLASH) has been shown to increase the therapeutic index with markedly reduced normal tissue toxicity and the same or better tumor cell killing. The challenge to achieve FLASH using x-rays, besides developing a high output linac, is to intensity-modulate the high-dose-rate x-rays so that the biological gain is not offset by the lack of physical dose conformity. In this study, we develop the ROtational direct Aperture optimization with a Decoupled ring-collimator (ROAD) to achieve simultaneous ultrafast delivery and complex dose modulation. The ROAD design includes a fast-rotating slip-ring linac and a decoupled collimator-ring with 75 pre-shaped multi-leaf-collimator (MLC) modules. The ring-source rotates at 1 rotation per second (rps) clockwise while the ring-collimator is either static or rotating at 1 rps counterclockwise, achieving 75 (ROAD-75) or 150 (ROAD-150) equal-angular beams for one full arc. The Direct Aperture Optimization (DAO) for ROAD was formulated to include a least-square dose fidelity, an anisotropic total variation term, and a single segment term. The FLASH dose (FD) and FLASH biological equivalent dose (FBED) were computed voxelwise, with the latter using a spatiotemporal model accounting for radiolytic oxygen depletion. ROAD was compared with clinical volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) on a brain, a lung, a prostate, and a head and neck cancer patient. The mean dose rate of ROAD-75 and ROAD-150 are 76.2 Gy s-1 and 112 Gy s-1 respectively to deliver 25 Gy single-fraction dose in 1 s. With improved PTV homogeneity, ROAD-150 reduced (max, mean) OAR physical dose by (4.8 Gy, 6.3 Gy). The average R50 and integral dose of (VMAT, ROAD-75, ROAD-150) are (4.8, 3.2, 3.2) and (89, 57, 56) Gy×Liter, respectively. The FD and FBED showed model dependent FLASH effects. The novel ROAD design achieves ultrafast dose delivery and improves physical dosimetry compared with clinical VMAT, providing a potentially viable engineering solution for x-ray FLASH radiotherapy.

Comparison of radiotherapy techniques with flattening filter and flattening filter-free in lung radiotherapy according to the treatment volume size.

In external radiotherapy (RT), the use of flattening filter-free (FFF) radiation beams obtained by removing the flattening filter (FF) in standard linear accelerators is rapidly increasing, and the benefits of clinical use are the issue of research. Advanced treatment techniques have increased the interest in the operation of linear accelerators in FFF mode. The differences of the beams with non-uniform dose distribution created by removing FF compared to the beams with uniform dose distribution used as a standard were examined. These differences were compared in the treatment plans of lung patients who have different planning target volumes (PTV). Clinac IX linear accelerator units were used. Twenty patients with previously completed treatment were divided into two groups depending on the size of the target volume. All patients underwent two different intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) plans using FF and FFF beams. The Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test was used to compare two different techniques (Significance p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two techniques when looking at the D2%(Gy), D98%(Gy), D50%(Gy), homogeneity (HI), and conformity index (CI) data for both groups. When the critical organ doses were evaluated, there was a statistically significant difference only in the V20(%) values of the lungs, but these differences were not very large. Monitor unit (MU) data were found to be lower in FF planning, and treatment time was lower in FFF planning. Except for shorter treatment times, and of the lungs V20(%) value, in standard fractionated RT of lung cancer, there was no significant difference between the use of FFF and FF techniques for large and small target volumes.

An IAEA survey of radiotherapy practice including quality assurance extent and depth.

Background: The IAEA recommends a quality assurance program in radiotherapy to ensure safe and effective treatments. In this study, radiotherapy departments were surveyed on their current practice including the extent and depth of quality assurance activities.Methods: Radiotherapy departments were voluntarily surveyed in three stages, firstly, in basic facility information, secondly, in quality assurance activities and treatment techniques, and thirdly, in a snapshot of quality assurance, departmental and treatment activities.Results: The IAEA received completed surveys from 381 radiotherapy departments throughout the world with 100 radiotherapy departments completing all three surveys. Dominant patterns were found in linac-based radiotherapy with access to treatment planning systems for 3D-CRT and 3D imaging. Staffing levels for major staff groups were on average in the range recommended by the IAEA. The modal patient workload per EBRT unit was as expected in the range of 21-30 patients per day, however significant instances of high workload (more than 50 patients per day per treatment unit) were reported. Staffing levels were found to correlate with amount of treatment equipment and patient workload. In a self-assessment of quality assurance performance, most radiotherapy departments reported that they would perform at least 60% of the quality assurance activities itemized in the second survey, with particular strength in equipment quality control. In a snapshot survey of quality assurance performance, again equipment quality control practice was well developed, particularly for the treatment equipment.Conclusions: The IAEA surveys provide a snapshot of current radiotherapy practice including quality assurance activities.

The first prospective implementation of markerless lung target tracking in an experimental quality assurance procedure on a standard linear accelerator.

The ability to track tumour motion without implanted markers on a standard linear accelerator (linac) could enable wide access to real-time adaptive radiotherapy for cancer patients. We previously have retrospectively validated a method for 3D markerless target tracking using intra-fractional kilovoltage (kV) projections acquired on a standard linac. This paper presents the first prospective implementation of markerless lung target tracking on a standard linac and its quality assurance (QA) procedure. The workflow and the algorithm developed to track the 3D target position during volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment delivery were optimised. The linac was operated in clinical QA mode, while kV projections were streamed to a dedicated computer using a frame-grabber software. The markerless target tracking accuracy and precision were measured in a lung phantom experiment under the following conditions: static localisation of seven distinct positions, dynamic localisation of five patient-measured motion traces, and dynamic localisation with treatment interruption. The QA guidelines were developed following the AAPM Task Group 147 report with the requirement that the tracking margin components, the margins required to account for tracking errors, did not exceed 5 mm in any direction. The mean tracking error ranged from 0.0 to 0.9 mm (left-right), -0.6 to -0.1 mm (superior-inferior) and -0.7 to 0.1 mm (anterior-posterior) over the three tests. Larger errors were found in cases with large left-right or anterior-posterior and small superior-inferior motion. The tracking margin components did not exceed 5 mm in any direction and ranged from 0.4 to 3.2 mm (left-right), 0.7 to 1.6 mm (superior-inferior) and 0.8 to 1.5 mm (anterior-posterior). This study presents the first prospective implementation of markerless lung target tracking on a standard linac and provides a QA procedure for its safe clinical implementation, potentially enabling real-time adaptive radiotherapy for a large population of lung cancer patients.

POSTAL TLD AUDIT OF HETEROGENEITY CORRECTIONS IN RADIOTHERAPY IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC.

In the Czech Republic, a more advanced version of postal audit in radiotherapy (RT) is available. It covers dose measurements with thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLD) in more complex conditions of irradiation, when dose distribution is affected by heterogeneities in the irradiated volume. Relative deviation between doses measured with TLDs and doses stated by RT centre should not exceed 3%. During 2015-2017, all Czech RT centres equipped with modern linear accelerators were subjected to this more advanced TLD audit. A total of  70% of participants complied with the limit of 3% in the first round of this audit.

Factor 10 Expedience of Monthly Linac Quality Assurance via an Ion Chamber Array and Automation Scripts.

PURPOSE: While critical for safe and accurate radiotherapy, monthly quality assurance of medical linear accelerators is time-consuming and takes physics resources away from other valuable tasks. The previous methods at our institution required 5 hours to perform the mechanical and dosimetric monthly linear accelerator quality assurance tests. An improved workflow was developed to perform these tests with higher accuracy, with fewer error pathways, in significantly less time. METHODS: A commercial ion chamber array (IC profiler, Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, Florida) is combined with automation scripts to consolidate monthly linear accelerator QA. The array was used to measure output, flatness, symmetry, jaw positions, gated dose constancy, energy constancy, collimator walkout, crosshair centering, and dosimetric leaf gap constancy. Treatment plans were combined with automation scripts that interface with Sun Nuclear's graphical user interface. This workflow was implemented on a standard Varian clinac, with no special adaptations, and can be easily applied to other C-arm linear accelerators. RESULTS: These methods enable, in 30 minutes, measurement and analysis of 20 of the 26 dosimetric and mechanical monthly tests recommended by TG-142. This method also reduces uncertainties in the measured beam profile constancy, beam energy constancy, field size, and jaw position tests, compared to our previous methods. One drawback is the increased uncertainty associated with output constancy. Output differences between IC profiler and farmer chamber in plastic water measurements over a 6-month period, across 4 machines, were found to have a 0.3% standard deviation for photons and a 0.5% standard deviation for electrons, which is sufficient for verifying output accuracy according to TG-142 guidelines. To minimize error pathways, automation scripts which apply the required settings, as well as check the exported data file integrity were employed. CONCLUSIONS: The equipment, procedure, and scripts used here reduce the time burden of routine quality assurance tests and in most instances improve precision over our previous methods.

Feasibility of a GATE Monte Carlo platform in a clinical pretreatment QA system for VMAT treatment plans using TrueBeam with an HD120 multileaf collimator.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the quality of patient-specific complicated treatment plans, including commercialized treatment planning systems (TPS) and commissioned beam data, we developed a process of quality assurance (QA) using a Monte Carlo (MC) platform. Specifically, we constructed an interface system that automatically converts treatment plan and dose matrix data in digital imaging and communications in medicine to an MC dose-calculation engine. The clinical feasibility of the system was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A dose-calculation engine based on GATE v8.1 was embedded in our QA system and in a parallel computing system to significantly reduce the computation time. The QA system automatically converts parameters in volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans to files for dose calculation using GATE. The system then calculates dose maps. Energies of 6 MV, 10 MV, 6 MV flattening filter free (FFF), and 10 MV FFF from a TrueBeam with HD120 were modeled and commissioned. To evaluate the beam models, percentage depth dose (PDD) values, MC calculation profiles, and measured beam data were compared at various depths (Dmax , 5 cm, 10 cm, and 20 cm), field sizes, and energies. To evaluate the feasibility of the QA system for clinical use, doses measured for clinical VMAT plans using films were compared to dose maps calculated using our MC-based QA system. RESULTS: A LINAC QA system was analyzed by PDD and profile according to the secondary collimator and multileaf collimator (MLC). Values for MC calculations and TPS beam data obtained using CC13 ion chamber (IBA Dosimetry, Germany) were consistent within 1.0%. Clinical validation using a gamma index was performed for VMAT treatment plans using a solid water phantom and arbitrary patient data. The gamma evaluation results (with criteria of 3%/3 mm) were 98.1%, 99.1%, 99.2%, and 97.1% for energies of 6 MV, 10 MV, 6 MV FFF, and 10 MV FFF, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We constructed an MC-based QA system for evaluating patient treatment plans and evaluated its feasibility in clinical practice. We observed robust agreement between dose calculations from our QA system and measurements for VMAT plans. Our QA system could be useful in other clinical settings, such as small-field SRS procedures or analyses of secondary cancer risk, for which dose calculations using TPS are difficult to verify.

Benchmarking of Monte Carlo model of Siemens Oncor® linear accelerator for 18MV photon beam: Determination of initial electron beam parameters.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to benchmark a Monte Carlo (MC) model of the 18 MV photon beam produced by the Siemens Oncor® linac using the BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc codes. METHODS: By matching the percentage depth doses and beam profiles calculated by MC simulations with measurements, the initial electron beam parameters including electron energy, full width at half maximum (spatial FWHM), and mean angular spread were derived for the 10×10 cm2 and 20×20 cm2 field sizes. The MC model of the 18 MV photon beam was then validated against the measurements for different field sizes (5×5, 30×30 and 40×40 cm2) by gamma index analysis. RESULTS: The optimum values for electron energy, spatial FWHM and mean angular spread were 14.2 MeV, 0.08 cm and 0.8 degree, respectively. The MC simulations yielded the comparable measurement results of these optimum parameters. The gamma passing rates (with acceptance criteria of 1% /1 mm) for percentage depth doses were found to be 100% for all field sizes. For cross-line profiles, the gamma passing rates were 100%, 97%, 95%, 96% and 95% for 5×5, 10×10, 20×20, 30×30 and 40×40 cm2 field sizes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: By validation of the MC model of Siemens Oncor® linac using various field sizes, it was found that both dose profiles of small and large field sizes were very sensitive to the changes in spatial FWHM and mean angular spread of the primary electron beam from the bending magnet. Hence, it is recommended that both small and large field sizes of the 18 MV photon beams should be considered in the Monte Carlo linac modeling.

Feasibility of novel in vivo EPID dosimetry system for linear accelerator quality control tests.

The main aim was to validate the capability of a novel EPID-based in vivo dosimetry system for machine-specific quality control (QC) tests. In current study, two sets of measurements were performed in Elekta Versa HD linear accelerator using novel iViewDose™ in vivo dosimetry software. In the first part, measurements were carried out to evaluate the feasibility of novel in vivo system for daily dosimetric QC tests including output constancy, percentage depth dose (PDD) and beam profile measurements. In addition to daily QC tests, measured output factor as a function of field size, leaf transmission and tongue and groove effect were compared with calculated TPS data. In the second part of the measurements, detection capability of iViewDose software for basic mechanical QC tests were investigated for different setup conditions. In dosimetric QC tests, measured output factor with changing field size, PDD, beam profile and leaf transmission factors were found to be compatible with calculated TPS data. Additionally, the EPID-based system was capable to detect given dose calibration errors of 1% with ± 0.02% deviation. In mechanical QC tests, it was found that iViewDose software was sensitive for catching errors in collimator rotation (≥ 1°), changes in phantom thickness (≥ 1 cm) and major differences in irradiated field size down to 1 mm. In conclusion, iViewDose was proved to be as useful EPID-based software for daily monitoring of linear accelerator beam parameters and it provides extra safety net to prevent machine based radiation incidents.

A simulation-based method for evaluating geometric tests of a linac c-arm in quality control in radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Assessment of the accuracy of geometric tests of a linac used in external beam therapy is crucial for ensuring precise dose delivery. In this paper, a new simulation-based method for assessing accuracy of such geometric tests is proposed and evaluated on a set of testing procedures. METHODS: Linac geometry testing methods used in this study are based on an established design of a two-module phantom. Electronic portal imaging device (EPID) images of fiducial balls contained in these modules can be used to automatically reconstruct linac geometry. The projection of the phantom modules fiducial balls onto the EPID detector plane is simulated for assumed nominal geometry of a linac. Then, random errors are added to the coordinates of the projections of the centers of the fiducial balls and the linac geometry is reconstructed from these data. RESULTS: Reconstruction is performed for a set of geometric test designs and it is shown how the dispersion of the reconstructed values of geometric parameters depends on the design of a geometric test. Assuming realistic accuracy of EPID image analysis, it is shown that for selected testing plans the reconstruction accuracy of geometric parameters can be significantly better than commonly used action thresholds for these parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Proposed solution has the potential to improve geometric testing design and practice. It is an important part of a fully automated geometric testing solution.

Do all the linear accelerators comply with the ICRU 91's constraints for stereotactic body radiation therapy treatments?

Recent technological developments in linear accelerators (linacs) and their imaging systems have made it possible to routinely perform stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) treatments. To ensure the security and quality of the treatments, national and international recommendations have been written. This review focuses on the recommendations of the report 91 of the International Commission on Radiation Units (ICRU) on stereotactic treatments with small photon beams and proposes to answer the question of the eligibility of the commercially available accelerators for the treatment of extra-cranial SRT (SBRT). The ICRU 91 report outlines important features needed to respect the constraints, which are high intensity photon beam, integrated image-guidance, high mechanical accuracy of the linac, multileaf collimator with reduced leaf width, bundled motion management and bundled 6 Dimensional "robotic" couch tabletop. Most of the contemporary linacs meet these recommendations, in particular, stereotactic dedicated linacs, or modern gantry-based linacs equipped with 3 dimensional cone-beam CT imaging and 2D-stereoscopic planar imaging. Commercially available ring-based linacs have some limitations: they offer only coplanar treatments, and couch movements are limited to translations and, some have limited imaging equipment and no ability to manage intrafraction motion. However, for performing SBRT, non-coplanar irradiations are not mandatory, contrarily to intracranial stereotactic irradiations. Furthermore, patients' rotations can be corrected, thanks to real-time adaptive radiotherapy available on MRI-linacs. Finally, significant improvements are expected in the short term to compensate the weaknesses of the current devices.

ESTIMATION OF THE ANISOTROPY EMISSION OF LPN/CIEMAT NEUTRON SOURCES: EFFECT OF HEAVY CAPSULE HOLDERS.

In order to estimate the anisotropy emission of 241Am-Be and 252Cf neutron sources from the Spanish Neutron Standards Laboratory (LPN/CIEMAT) detailed models of sources capsules and capsule holders were designed with the MCNPX code. Simulations of the sources inside the capsules without the capsule holders were done to validate the MC model by comparison with experimental results provided by other authors. After that, the capsule holders were incorporated to the simulation. In general, a good agreement has been found between measurements and our calculations. Results show the additional encapsulations have significant influence on anisotropy factors, energy spectra and dose rates.

Technical note: MLC-tracking performance on the Elekta unity MRI-linac.

Recently, multileaf collimator (MLC)-tracking has been technically and clinically demonstrated showing promising improvements of radiotherapy of mobile sites. Furthermore, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided treatments have shown to provide superior targetting performance due to on-line soft-tissue imaging. Hitherto, the combination of MLC-tracking and MRI has not been investigated using clinically released hardware. In this note we aim to describe the technical feasibilty of such a combination on a clinically operating MRI-linac. The MLC-tracking system is characterized by quantifying the latencies and geometric errors produced by the system. In order to reach optimization recommendations, the tracking system was first characterized using a quasi-ideal position sensor, isolating the performance of the MLC only. Subsequently, the analysis was repeated using real-time MRI as the positioning source for the MLC. For the isolated MLC, we found latencies of 20.67 ms and minimal overshooting behaviour. The latencies for MRI-guidance were 347.45 ms at 4 Hz imaging and 204 ms at 8 Hz. We showed that MLC-tracking on the Elekta Unity using integrated MRI is technically supported and feasible. The isolated analysis of the MLC demonstrated the negligible contribution of the MLC in MRI-guided tracking. The latency and geometric errors caused by the sampling properties of MRI exceed the MLC-related errors by several factors. Most gain for real-time MRI-based adaptive radiotherapy can therefore be realized by optimizing and accelerating the MRI acquisition process.

Use of a Linear Accelerator for Conducting In Vitro Radiobiology Experiments.

Radiation therapy remains one of the cornerstones of cancer management. For most cancers, it is the most effective, nonsurgical therapy to debulk tumors. Here, we describe a method to irradiate cancer cells with a linear accelerator. The advancement of linear accelerator technology has improved the precision and efficiency of radiation therapy. The biological effects of a wide range of radiation doses and dose rates continue to be an intense area of investigation. Use of linear accelerators can facilitate these studies using clinically relevant doses and dose rates.

An Alternative Approach to Estimating Instrument Decision Thresholds for Clearance of Personal Property From Accelerator Facilities.

Personal property exposed to particle beams and stray radiation at high-energy particle accelerators may contain induced volumetric radioactivity. At both the Brookhaven National Laboratory's (BNL) Collider-Accelerator and National Synchrotron Light Source II Facilities this radioactivity contains both gamma-emitting and beta-emitting radionuclides. The US Department of Energy (US DOE) recently published Technical Standard 6004-2016. This standard provides radionuclide-specific volumetric screening levels (Bq g) below which accelerator materials are eligible for clearance and release from radiological control. The standard also establishes several approaches for decision-making relative to the clearance process implemented, one of which is the "Indistinguishable from Background" (IFB) approach. BNL implements the IFB approach for survey of potentially activated accelerator materials. Radiological control technicians perform on-contact measurements using portable scintillators that are sensitive to gamma and x-ray radiation. Instrument decision thresholds are usually estimated by measuring total background counts over a pre-determined counting interval using an integrating count-rate instrument and then applying an appropriate confidence level factor. Measurement results obtained in a low background area are then directly compared to these detection thresholds. This paper presents an alternative statistical approach using logistic regression for estimating instrument decision thresholds for small-mass items using the IFB method and compares them to established release criteria. On-contact Micro-R meter measurements are correlated with analytical data obtained for activated materials weighing 0.3 kg to 3 kg. Analytical sample results show that Co and Na accounted for more than 90% of total sample radioactivity. Co and Na emit high-energy gamma rays and are both group one radionuclides as defined in DOE-6004-2016. For this size material the results show that the probability of detecting residual volumetric radioactivity at the Group One screening level concentration of 0.11 Bq g under normal field conditions is about 68%. This increases to 95% at 0.16 Bq g. The 95% confidence interval is 0.09 Bq g to 0.23 Bq g. Grouping low-mass items during the survey process could mitigate this concern if all items are expected to have similar activity concentrations.

MRI commissioning of 1.5T MR-linac systems - a multi-institutional study.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic Resonance linear accelerator (MR-linac) systems represent a new type of technology that allows for online MR-guidance for high precision radiotherapy (RT). Currently, the first MR-linac installations are being introduced clinically. Since the imaging performance of these integrated MR-linac systems is critical for their application, a thorough commissioning of the MRI performance is essential. However, guidelines on the commissioning of MR-guided RT systems are not yet defined and data on the performance of MR-linacs are not yet available. MATERIALS & METHODS: Here we describe a comprehensive commissioning protocol, which contains standard MRI performance measurements as well as dedicated hybrid tests that specifically assess the interactions between the Linac and the MRI system. The commissioning results of four MR-linac systems are presented in a multi-center study. RESULTS: Although the four systems showed similar performance in all the standard MRI performance tests, some differences were observed relating to the hybrid character of the systems. Field homogeneity measurements identified differences in the gantry shim configuration, which was later confirmed by the vendor. CONCLUSION: Our results highlight the importance of dedicated hybrid commissioning tests and the ability to compare the machines between institutes at this very early stage of clinical introduction. Until formal guidelines and tolerances are defined the tests described in this study may be used as a practical guideline. Moreover, the multi-center results provide initial bench mark data for future MR-linac installations.

Seasonal variations in measurements of linear accelerator output.

PURPOSE: Seasonal trends in linear accelerator output have been reported by at least one institution and data have suggested that they may be present at our center as well. The purpose of this work was to characterize these trends and determine whether local environmental conditions within the treatment rooms may be impacting the linear accelerators and/or the quality control (QC) dosimeter. METHODS: Runtime plots of daily output data, acquired using an in-house ion chamber-based device, over 3 yr and for 15 linear accelerators of different makes and models were reviewed and evaluated. Environmental conditions were monitored prospectively in a representative treatment room for approximately 9 months and evaluated for correlations with output trends. Independent measures of output using daily MV portal images were compared with output measurements using the ion chamber-based device. A separate controlled experiment probing the response of the in-house dosimeter to humidity changes over time was also carried out using a constant current source and a small enclosure. RESULTS: Runtime plots of output revealed sinusoidal, seasonal variations that were consistent across all treatment units, irrespective of manufacturer, model, or age of machine. The amplitude of the variation was on the order of 1% and maintained a yearly period. The independent measure of output using MV portal images did not corroborate the seasonal trends observed with the daily QC dosimeter. Based on the controlled experiment, the QC dosimeter was found to have a dependence on relative humidity changes, decreasing 1% in output per 30% increase in relative humidity. CONCLUSIONS: Results confirm the presence of underlying seasonal variations in measured output from the linear accelerators. The findings identify humidity impact on the measurement device as the underlying cause of the cyclical changes and not the accelerators themselves. These results could help minimize unwarranted machine servicing.

Assessment of radiation leakage from treatment applicator of Siemens Primus Plus and Siemens Artiste linear accelerators.

AIM: The purpose of this study is to measure radiation leakage of Siemens Primus Plus and Siemens Artiste linear accelerators in electron mode and to compare the leakage level with that recommended by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this assessment, Siemens Primus Plus linear accelerator with 10 cm × 10 cm, 15 cm × 15 cm, and 25 cm × 25 cm applicators was used. The radiation leakage in lateral and vertical directions was measured for Siemens Primus Plus and Siemens Artiste linear accelerators. RESULTS: Data derived from radiation leakage measurement for Siemens Primus Plus and Siemens Artiste linear accelerators in lateral direction from the field edge and in vertical direction from the applicator were reported. The radiation leakage data were then compared with the IEC standard to evaluate in-air field leakage. CONCLUSION: Comparing the radiation leakage level from fields with the IEC standard for two applicators, the maximum that was occurred for 12 MeV electron beam and applicator size of 10 cm × 10 cm in Siemens Artiste linear accelerator was 2.3%, which is less than the IEC's recommended limit of 10%. It is concluded that the leakage amount is much less than the specified limit and that both of the linear accelerators have high level of safety. Considering the measurement stage, it also needs to be noted that the beam angle affected the radiation leakage level from field edge, and in 25° angle, it is higher than in 0° angle. Comparing radiation leakage from the right side of the field for the two linear accelerators, the amount of leakage for Siemens Primus Plus linear accelerator is more than Siemens Artiste linear accelerator.

Machine learning for automated quality assurance in radiotherapy: A proof of principle using EPID data description.

PURPOSE: Developing automated methods to identify task-driven quality assurance (QA) procedures is key toward increasing safety, efficacy, and efficiency. We investigate the use of machine learning (ML) methods for possible visualization, automation, and targeting of QA, and assess its performance using multi-institutional data. METHODS: To enable automated analysis of QA data given its higher dimensional nature, we used nonlinear kernel mapping with support vector data description (SVDD) driven approaches. Instead of using labeled data as in typical support vector machine (SVM) applications, which requires exhaustive annotation, we applied a clustering extension of SVDD, which identifies the minimal enclosing hypersphere in the feature space defined by a kernel function separating normal operations from possible failures (i.e., outliers). In our case, QA test data are mapped by a Gaussian kernel to a higher dimensional feature space and then the minimal enclosing sphere was identified. This sphere, when mapped back to the input data space along the principal components, can separate the data into several components, each enclosing a separate cluster of QA points that could be used to evaluate tolerance boundaries and test reliability. We evaluated this approach for gantry sag, radiation field shift, and [multileaf collimator (MLC)] offset data acquired using electronic portal imaging devices (EPID), as representative examples. RESULTS: Data from eight LINACS and seven institutions (n = 119) were collected. A standardized EPID image of a phantom with fiducials provided deviation estimates between the radiation field and phantom center at four cardinal gantry angles. Deviation measurements in the horizontal direction (0°, 180°) were used to determine the gantry sag and deviations in the vertical direction (90°, 270°) were used to determine the field shift. These measurements were fed into the SVDD clustering algorithm with varying hypersphere radii (Gaussian widths). For gantry sag analysis, two clusters were identified one of which contained 2.5% of the outliers and also exceeded the 1 mm tolerance set by TG-142. In the case of field shifts, SVM clustering identified two distinct classes of measurements primarily driven by variations in the second principal component at 270°. Results from MLC analysis identified one outlier cluster (0.34%) along Leaf offset Constancy (LoC) axis that coincided with TG-142 limits. CONCLUSION: Machine learning methods based on SVDD clustering are promising for developing automated QA tools and providing insights into their reliability and reproducibility.